Warning: array_map(): Argument #2 should be an array in /opt/bitnami/apps/wordpress/htdocs/wp-content/themes/freshnews/functions.php on line 46

Warning: implode(): Invalid arguments passed in /opt/bitnami/apps/wordpress/htdocs/wp-content/themes/freshnews/functions.php on line 46
Chevron's Goliath Strategy | Oil Watchdog

Press ReleaseNews Clipping

Chevron's Goliath Strategy

CONTACT:By

Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 3:46 pm

    Chevron's Goliath Strategy

    3-19-08 by dugan

     

     

    The Oakland-adjacent and working class city of Richmond, Calif., is on the verge of allowing Chevron to
    proceed with a huge, contentious "upgrade" of its refinery there so it
    can process dirtier, heavier grades of crude oil. Chevron says the
    plant will just become “more efficient.” Critics, including state Atty. Gen. Jerry Brown,
    see a stealth attempt to allow more, and more dangerous, pollution in
    an already stressed environment.

    Brown, however, also said there was no
    state law that would let him do more than urge the small and badly
    overmatched city of Richmond to do a better job. That seems like a refinery-sized loophole in the law. 

    Chevron’s
    project could set a dangerous precedent for more refinery “upgrades,”
    especially those that could handle filthy Canadian oil tars.
    Canada’s tar sands producers aren’t yet shipping their sticky, dirty, environmentally disastrous product to California, but they’re planning on it. Chevron and other refiners are certainly planning on using it.

    Chevron
    originally touted the project at Richmond as a significant expansion of
    refining capacity at the plant, which would trigger requirements for
    clean-air upgrades of both new and old equipment. Then, by shifting to
    “upgrades”, Chevron evaded federal air quality requirements and got to
    deal with Richmond’s overmatched city planners instead of the federal
    permitting requirements.

    Now, those upgrades are looking a lot
    like both an expansion of capacity and an increase in the release of
    air garbage from sulfur to selenium, according to an in-depth analysis
    by Greg Karras, senior scientist at a state pollution watchdog group,
    Communities for a Better Environment. (The short version of his
    conclusions is in this letter.)

    The letter concludes:

    “The
    [Chevron] Project as proposed would switch to extremely contaminated,
    price-discounted feedstock that could include extra-heavy oil and oil
    sands when better quality oil is available.  By describing it as an
    equipment replacement that only shifts to similar oils with one-percent
    more sulfur … the [Final Environmental Impact Review] provides a
    false description of the Project. The FEIR is fundamentally deficient
    and must be revised and recirculated for public review.”

    Atty.
    Gen. Brown earlier called  for better review by Richmond of both a new
    hydrogen-production plant on the refinery premises and the main
    refinery overhaul. (The hydrogen is not for a clean-fuels project, but
    because Chevron needs hydrogen to process the dirtier oils.) But Brown
    has acknowledged that "there is no [state] rule or regulation in place
    that binds the City’s actions", which is a shock when such a huge
    project could impact air quality statewide. in a recent letter, Brown
    seemed to accept the specious claims of the city’s final environmental impact report.
    He merely urged the Richmond City Council to ask for more environmental
    assurances from Chevron. The city council might also demand a
    "mitigation payment" (see "bribe") by Chevron to the city.

    If Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger wants to
    prevent a deeper tarnish of his Green Giant image, he’d better have
    something to say about this Chevron project, including an invitation
    for state laws that would even up a relationship like that between
    needy Richmond and filthy-rich Chevron.

    , ,

    Leave a Reply